Since submission approval staff will be working on their own, without a GM staring over their shoulder, we do need something in place to make sure we screen for proper reviews. Rather than starting up a fuss in chat, any such situations will be brought here.
The concept is simple: if you disagree with a staff member's decision, you bring it here to get a second opinion from a GM.
If a release/tech/item is approved which you think is overpowered, bring it to our attention here. We'll give it another look to make sure it's balanced.
If a release/tech/item is denied yet you think it is acceptable, post it here. We'll decide whether the staff member's choices were justified.
In a situation where it was a GM that did the original review, you can still request another GM review. However, a second opinion is the final decision. You cannot continue to apply for a third or fourth or fifth. After the second opinion, you must resubmit in order to get another review.
Post here with a link to the review in question and a brief explanation of why you disagree. Do not be afraid of stepping on anyone's toes: we're here to have fun, and part of that is making sure everybody plays fair. Just be professional when explaining why; don't post anything like, "Bob's grass-cutter kai should have been denied because Bob's so stupid he'd probably chop up the dandelions and spread weeds everywhere."
Additional use for GM review:
Occasionally, after a feat/release/item has been approved, a user will notice a small detail they wish to change. Perhaps you want to change the release phrase, or make the blade green, or even adjust the range on an ability to be clearer.
Now, rather than spend a spec point on minor changes like that, you can ask for GM approval to make those changes. We will review it to make sure that it doesn't hugely affect the approved version.
The concept is simple: if you disagree with a staff member's decision, you bring it here to get a second opinion from a GM.
If a release/tech/item is approved which you think is overpowered, bring it to our attention here. We'll give it another look to make sure it's balanced.
If a release/tech/item is denied yet you think it is acceptable, post it here. We'll decide whether the staff member's choices were justified.
In a situation where it was a GM that did the original review, you can still request another GM review. However, a second opinion is the final decision. You cannot continue to apply for a third or fourth or fifth. After the second opinion, you must resubmit in order to get another review.
Post here with a link to the review in question and a brief explanation of why you disagree. Do not be afraid of stepping on anyone's toes: we're here to have fun, and part of that is making sure everybody plays fair. Just be professional when explaining why; don't post anything like, "Bob's grass-cutter kai should have been denied because Bob's so stupid he'd probably chop up the dandelions and spread weeds everywhere."
Additional use for GM review:
Occasionally, after a feat/release/item has been approved, a user will notice a small detail they wish to change. Perhaps you want to change the release phrase, or make the blade green, or even adjust the range on an ability to be clearer.
Now, rather than spend a spec point on minor changes like that, you can ask for GM approval to make those changes. We will review it to make sure that it doesn't hugely affect the approved version.